Description
In the latter half of the nineteenth century, colleges and universities transformed their thinking of the body as they institutionalized physical education, recreational activities, and especially physical exercise. In this study, I examine the historical discourse on physical exercise and

In the latter half of the nineteenth century, colleges and universities transformed their thinking of the body as they institutionalized physical education, recreational activities, and especially physical exercise. In this study, I examine the historical discourse on physical exercise and training during this period. I employ the theoretical and methodological practices of Michel Foucault's archeological and genealogical work to write a "history of the present." I challenge the essential narrative of physical fitness on college and university campuses. I also discuss nineteenth century notions of ethics and masculinity as a way of understanding twenty-first century ethics and masculinity. Ultimately, I use the historical discourse to argue that institutionalization of recreation and fitness centers and activities have less to do with health and well-being and more to do with disciplining bodies and controlling individuals.
Reuse Permissions
  • Downloads
    pdf (4.4 MB)

    Details

    Title
    • Teddy Roosevelt, dandyism, and masculinities: a nominalist history of fitness centers in the United States
    Contributors
    Date Created
    2012
    Resource Type
  • Text
  • Collections this item is in
    Note
    • Partial requirement for: M.A., Arizona State University, 2012
      Note type
      thesis
    • Includes bibliographical references (p. 94-96)
      Note type
      bibliography
    • Field of study: Educational leadership and policy studies

    Citation and reuse

    Statement of Responsibility

    by Timothy Wells

    Machine-readable links