Description
Many working in the criminal justice system and beyond are trying to ascertain whether there should be continued use of restricted housing or solitary confinement. This study examines knowledge of and general support for restrictive housing. Using randomly assigned, factorial

Many working in the criminal justice system and beyond are trying to ascertain whether there should be continued use of restricted housing or solitary confinement. This study examines knowledge of and general support for restrictive housing. Using randomly assigned, factorial vignettes, the survey manipulates populations and reasons for placement in restrictive housing to determine situational support for the correctional practice. Results indicate that among a sample of students (N=363), little is known about restrictive housing, despite substantial exposure to both fiction and nonfiction media on the subject. Averages of approval ratings indicate the public is neutral on whether the practice is humane, including its placement procedures and conditions, though there was slight disapproval of the placement of mentally ill inmates in segregation. Analysis shows that age, some reasons for placement, whether placement is voluntary, and extreme durations of time in isolation are significantly associated with public approval.
Reuse Permissions
  • Downloads
    pdf (303.7 KB)

    Details

    Title
    • Solitary Refinement: A Nuanced Look at Public Knowledge and Opinion of Restrictive Housing
    Contributors
    Date Created
    2017
    Resource Type
  • Text
  • Collections this item is in
    Note
    • Masters Thesis Criminology and Criminal Justice 2017

    Machine-readable links